Mark Koenig
Some myths start out being true and become false over time. Today’s myth - “the only reason to move to the cloud is to cut costs” - is a good example. In the early days of SaaS, adoption was driven primarily by a need to cut costs. Sometimes this was expressly stated as a need to reduce the tangible, direct costs (hardware plus software licensing and maintenance) associated with an application, or the desire to opt out of costly upgrade cycles. Other times, it was a softer goal of simplifying the software environment, and with it the cost of managing complexity. Regardless, the initial value proposition of cloud computing was seen primarily as cost reduction, and for some, that remains the primary driver to move to the cloud.
As I’ve written before, there is nothing wrong with “better, faster and cheaper.” But that is only a part of the cloud computing story. While cost reduction remains a key component of the cloud computing value proposition, agility is an equally if not more important reason to invest in cloud computing solutions. This has been supported in a number of research reports coming out. For example, Sandhill reached out to more than 500 IT executives in their “Leaders in the Cloud” survey and found that 49% of participants mentioned “business agility” as a driver of cloud adoption, as compared with 46% who mentioned “cost efficiency”. Appirio’s soon-to-be-published “State of the Cloud” report had similar findings (more on that soon).
The cloud’s agility benefits were made clear to me during a recent client requirements workshop. The workshop was originally conceived as an opportunity to finalize requirements for a prototype of a new cloud application. However, the VP of the business unit had just that week communicated a change in their go-to-market strategy for 2011, so the meeting agenda quickly changed to address the impact of the new strategy across the client’s cloud applications. By the end of the meeting the client team had laid out a plan to modify their applications, including the new prototype, identified the new reports it would need to modify its environment, and validated that these changes could be made in time for the start of the new fiscal year. In contrast, they said the last they went through such a strategic shift, they had to delay the roll-out by three months: they needed the extra time to modify the on-premise application environment that they were running their business on at the time.
When we work with our clients to build a roadmap and business case for cloud investments, we consistently find that the business benefits are often times orders of magnitude more than the cost savings. It is the combination of business agility and cost savings the cloud-model provides that forms the foundation for innovation and business transformation. Companies that fail to recognize this will sub-optimize their cloud investments - and risk being left behind by more nimble competitors.

Tags
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(63)
-
►
November
(6)
- Time to Nominate Your Favorite Cloudwasher for the...
- Mobile and Social: Unrelated Buzzwords or Hydrogen...
- Social HCM: Why Workday’s Chatter Integration Isn’...
- Salesforce Buys Model Metrics - What Does it Mean ...
- Green Light, Red Light: IT’s Dilemma After The Clo...
- Ways to use crowdsourcing to increase innovation
-
►
October
(8)
- 5 Reasons Why Salesforce/Chatter Could Win the Soc...
- 5 Steps to Getting Started with the Social Enterpr...
- Workday Rising 2011: Workday Rings On-premise ERP’...
- Blogging from Workday Rising: A cloud strategy to ...
- #FearTheCloud
- Clouds...They're Everywhere! Introducing “The Was...
- The Cloud Broker’s Role in Creative Destruction
- Realizing the Social Enterprise Vision: Learning f...
-
►
August
(12)
- Accelerating your Business with the Cloud: A Dream...
- Dreamforce Keynote: Breaking Boundaries with the S...
- Data.com: Apps without Data are Dead
- The Social Enterprise: What is it? Does it really ...
- Want a social enterprise? You’d better be in the c...
- Business Is Social - Blogging for the Huffington P...
- What the Cloud Leaders Can Learn From Each Other
- Appirio’s Growth: A Story of Disruption
-
►
November
(6)
-
▼
2010
(53)
-
▼
September
(7)
- Hearing from "Accidental Cloud Leaders" at the Clo...
- Reintroducing the Appirio Cloud Ecosystem
- Learning from Our Customers - Bern Abplanalp, Conv...
- "Single largest opportunity in cloud computing" - ...
- Introducing CloudWorks - Delivering on the Promise...
- Appirio Partners with Workday - The Next Step in t...
- Mythbuster Monday (Part 6 of the Series): Cloud Co...
-
▼
September
(7)
Monday, September 6, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe
Subscribe
Stay up to date on the latest from the CIO's Guide to Cloud Computing and On-Demand








Great post Mark. While costs is a piece of the equation....I really feel the biggest value along with agility is the defining of your systems.
ReplyDeleteTo be able to move to the cloud, to be able to scale properly...you have to really define your systems at a granular level. Otherwise you can't move, scale or achieve agility.
There are so many benefits from this process.
Hey Kin -
ReplyDeleteThanks for the kind words. I hear what you are saying about taking the time to define your systems as a more granular level, but at the same time, this can't be the end of it.
Once you have that inventory complete, there should be a structured process to identify pain points, risk and rewards of moving to the cloud. This is what we mean when we talk about building a cloud roadmap.
Thanks again for reading...
Cheers.... Mark