Friday, July 29, 2011

Opportunities in the Social Web are “over.” Unless you’re at work.

Ryan Nichols

Roger McNamee has been making the rounds explaining why he thinks the Social Web is “over.” We heard him make this case at yesterday's AlwaysOn Innovation Summit (where we were flattered to be recognized as a member of the AlwaysOn Global 250).

Roger’s argument goes like this: given the massive social graph assembled by today’s social platforms, it’s hopeless to try and do to Facebook and Twiitter what these companies did to Friendster and MySpace. In fact, he’d like his fellow VCs to “stop trading dipshit little social companies for $15 million bucks and go do something really important.” Like invent what he calls the “hyperweb.” (I can’t explain this, but you can read about it here.)

Now, it’s probably been a while since Roger has worked in a Fortune 500 company (he’s had better things to do!), so we thought it was worth a quick post to reflect on the state of “social” in the enterprise, where it’s fair to say that the social web is far from over. In fact, its hard to argue that it’s really begun.



To start, we can’t even agree on what to call the application of the social web in the enterprise. Jive Software calls it the “consumerprise,” reflecting the idea that a whole set of consumer trends ranging from social computing to self-service apps are going to redefine how technology is used in the enterprise. They held an event this week to show press and analysts what this “consumerprise” looks like—imagine business people deciding what apps are going to make them most productive, and installing (and paying) for those apps on their own, just as they do on their iPhones. Appirio is a big believer in this trend—we were there at the event showing off a Jive app that allows salespeople to access their CRM from their community.

Yammer is focused on the “internal social network,” and is building a “system of engagement” that integrates with and complements the systems of record that have traditionally been the focus of enterprise IT. Yammer CEO David Sacks said “It is clear that every organization, regardless of industry, location or size, can benefit from enterprise social networking.”

Lithium is focused on social customer engagement. CMO Katy Keim articulated the idea well during her panel yesterday at AlwaysOn: “Companies are going to rethink what it means to be a customer. Social customers want more than just a transaction. They want to belong-- companies will bring them in to develop, sell, and support products.” Lithium calls this idea Social CRM.

Salesforce.com is focused on building the “Social Enterprise.” This is the central theme of their upcoming Dreamforce conference, and Benioff claims that while Salesforce may have been “born cloud—today, we’re being reborn social.” Salesforce is offering customers an innovative platform for the Social Enterprise, giving companies a variety of ways to put a real relationship with customers at the center of everything they do, from marketing to sales to service to developing and delivering socially-enabled products and services. The first step is to engage with your customers on public social networks. Then you need to connect your employees together in your own social network. Finally, you’re ready to make all of your products and processes social. You can hear Benioff explain the vision here.

Again, we’re big believers in all these ideas. Our acquisition of the TRE3 Group formed the backbone of a rapidly growing Social Enterprise practice at Appirio, where we help companies figure all of this out. Because, not surprisingly, most companies DO need a little bit of help figuring all of this out.

No matter what you call it, most companies realize that social technology is just a means to an end—a method to accomplish specific business objectives. It's a challenge to translate all of these ideas about social technology from the consumer internet into concrete benefits for a company. These are the type of questions we’re hearing from our enterprise customers:
  • How do I translate my brand’s fans and “likes” into word of mouth referrals and cost-effective lead generation?
  • How do I translate my sales team’s feeds and followers into shorter deal cycles and higher win rates?
  • How do I translate my support team’s social graph into faster case resolution and more satisfied customers? 
  • How do I translate my customer’s ideas and suggestions into new, high value products and services?
There’s no easy answer to any of these questions. Which is exactly why (with due respect to Roger!), we’re a little skeptical that innovation in the social web is over… at least when applied to world of work.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

The Cloud Can’t Even Handle Me Right Now

Narinder Singh

Over the past couple of years we have seen cloud become the most popular term for describing every technology offering ever created.  It’s spawned countless debates over what is cloud, how important is being multi-tenant, private vs. public cloud, etc.

While the majority of the debate still rages, over the last several months we have seen a marked difference in customer engagement and areas of interest.  Companies want to make the elements that describe the cloud to describe their business as well-- words like efficiency, effectiveness, agility, speed and innovation are the top of every executive’s priority list.  The conversation about “the cloud” has turned into a conversation about the aspirations of the business.

The focus has become on the outcome (instead of the inputs).

Now many will say “of course, it’s always been about the business, the cloud is just another technology” - but that misses the point.  The hype around the cloud has raised expectations so that the same old technology can’t achieve the new level of outcomes expected by the business and users. Customers expect apps to be easy to use, available everywhere, mobile friendly, fast, and able to adapt as the environment changes.  The underlying cloud technology might be necessary, but is no longer the focus.

We hear companies say things like:
  • “I don’t care about multi-tenancy-- I just want solutions that constantly getting better several times a year without my having to upgrade or change anything I do.”
  • “I don’t care about ‘PaaS’-- I just want my programmers to love it and satisfy the needs of business users who want to configure their apps quickly.  And it better be mobile ready, allow me to create social and connected apps - and all of the above.”
  • “I don’t care about ‘IaaS’-- I just want to know we can scale up or down to handle the changing volume of users and customers in my business”
  • “I don’t care if it’s in the ‘public’ cloud-- I just want all of the above available to my business as a pay-as-you go subscription, without having to worry about setting it all up.”
Of course, these companies quickly learn that if you really want solutions that continuously improve, built on extensible platforms, running on scalable infrastructure, available as a subscription, then you absolutely need the underlying technology of multi-tenant, SaaS, public PaaS and IaaS.  The real question that both CIOs and business leaders are asking is how to force movement beyond the incremental--- how is what you are proposing going to markedly change an outcome in the business ?  If you can’t translate a technology solution directly into business benefit, then it is immediate dismissed.

This actually applies to the CIO and the IT function as well:  Internal technology investments must clear the bar of making IT dramatically more productive/efficient/innovative etc. - IT must itself function “as a service” in its ability to scale up or down in capabilities and apply them dynamically to the most important priorities.

Terminology around the cloud, and technical debates around what it is and isn’t are no longer able to handle the discussion around the potential for change.  And that is progress!